Home
This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Pedi-COVID Rx Updates 2025: Acting Early — Therapeutic Decision-Making in Pediatrics

Share

Description

This program is supported by an independent education grant from Pfizer Global Medical Grants. This online education program has been designed solely for U.S. healthcare professionals only. The content is not available for healthcare professionals in any other countries.

Join leading pediatric infectious disease expert Prof. Buddy Creech for this concise, case-based virtual CME module focusing on early therapeutic decisions for pediatric patients with COVID-19. This session provides a practical, risk-based approach to patient stratification, timely testing, and initiating antiviral and immunomodulatory therapies to mitigate the risk of severe disease and complications.

Prefer to read instead? Read our Key Clinical Summary here.

Accreditation: 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™

Session Highlights:

  • Stratify High Risk: Learn to identify pediatric patients at high risk for severe COVID-19 complications, focusing on age <1 month and the presence of comorbidities such as cardiovascular, neurologic, chronic GI/kidney disease, diabetes, and immunocompromised states.
  • Antiviral Options: Review the current antiviral treatments available for pediatric patients, including their recommended use, routes, and optimal timing from illness onset.
  • Inpatient Treatment Decisions: Evaluate inpatient treatment recommendations based on a patient's oxygen demand, making considerations for patients with progressive severe disease or elevated inflammatory markers.

Who Should Attend:

U.S.-based clinicians caring for children, including:

  • Pediatricians
  • Pediatric Infectious Disease Specialists
  • Family Medicine and Internal Medicine Physicians
  • Primary and Urgent Care Providers
  • Advanced Practice Providers (NPs, PAs)

Faculty

Prof. Buddy Creech is Professor of Pediatric Infectious Diseases at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, where he serves as Associate Director of the Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program and Co-Director of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Fellowship. His research focuses on the clinical and molecular epidemiology of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA), with an emphasis on host–pathogen interactions and immune responses to infection.

Prof. Creech also leads and participates in clinical trials of vaccines and therapeutics targeting S. aureus, influenza, and malaria. He earned his medical degree from the University of Tennessee College of Medicine, completed residency and fellowship training at Vanderbilt Children’s Hospital, and holds a Master of Public Health from Vanderbilt University.

Continuing Education Information

Commercial support: This program is supported by an independent education grant from Pfizer Global Medical Grants.

This continuing education activity will be provided by AffinityCE and MedAll. This activity will provide continuing education credit for physicians. A statement of participation is available to other attendees.

Disclosures

Prof C. Buddy Creech has disclosed financial relationships within the past 24 months with the following ineligible companies: Sanofi, AstraZeneca, GSK, Merck, Dianthus, TD Cowen Investments, and Guidepoint Global (in the capacity of a consultant). He serves on Data and Safety Monitoring Boards for GSK and Bavarian Nordic, and he contributes as a content editor for UpToDate. He has additionally received grant funding from the National Institutes of Health, the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, and Pfizer Vaccines for work related to a Clostridioides difficile vaccine clinical trial. His prior relationship with Moderna, involving grant funding, concluded within the past 24 months.

These disclosures are provided in accordance with ACCME standards to ensure transparency and uphold the integrity of continuing education. Prof Creech does not intend to reference any unlabeled or unapproved uses of products during the presentation.

AffinityCE staff, MedAll staff, as well as planners and reviewers, have no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose.

Mitigation of Relevant Financial Relationships

AffinityCE adheres to the ACCME’s Standards for Integrity and Independence in Accredited Continuing Education. Any individuals in a position to control the content of a CME activity, including faculty, planners, reviewers, or others, are required to disclose all relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies. Relevant financial relationships were mitigated by the peer review of content by non-conflicted reviewers prior to the commencement of the program.

Activity Accreditation for Health Professions

Physicians

This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint providership of AffinityCE and MedAll. AffinityCE is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

AffinityCE designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Physician Assistants

This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint providership of AffinityCE and MedAll. AffinityCE is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

AffinityCE designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physician assistants should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Nurse Practitioners

This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint providership of AffinityCE and MedAll. AffinityCE is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

AffinityCE designates this enduring material a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Nurse practitioners should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Nurses & Other Professionals

All other health care professionals completing this continuing education activity will be issued a statement of participation indicating the number of hours of continuing education credit. This may be used for professional education CE credit. Please consult your accrediting organization or licensing board for their acceptance of this CE activity.

System Requirements

Mobile device (e.g., large-format smart phone; laptop or tablet computer) or desktop computer with a video display of at least 1024 × 768 pixels at 24-bit color depth, capable of connecting to the Internet at broadband or faster speeds, with a current version Internet browser and popular document viewing software (e.g., Microsoft Office, PDF viewer, image viewer) installed. Support for streaming or downloadable audio-visual materials (e.g., streaming MP4, MP3 audio) in hardware and software may be required to view, review, or participate in portions of the program

Unapproved and/or off-label use disclosure

AffinityCE/MedAll requires CE faculty to disclose to the participants:

1. When products or procedures being discussed are off-label, unlabeled, experimental, and/or investigational (not US Food and Drug Administration [FDA] approved); and

2. Any limitations on the information presented, such as data that are preliminary or that represent ongoing research, interim analyses, and/or unsupported opinion.

Participation Costs

There is no cost to participate in this program.

CME Inquiries

For all CME policy-related inquiries, please contact us at ce@affinityced.com.

This continuing education activity is active starting December 10th 2025 and will expire on November 26th 2026. Estimated time to complete this activity: 15 minutes.

Learning objectives

Initiate evidence-based COVID-19 therapy for eligible high-risk children utilizing safety and efficacy data as well as family-centered shared-decision strategies that overcome logistical barriers to early treatment.

Similar communities

View all

Similar events and on demand videos

Computer generated transcript

Warning!
The following transcript was generated automatically from the content and has not been checked or corrected manually.

Hi, I'm Doctor Buddy Creech, and I'm a pediatric infectious diseases physician here in Nashville, Tennessee. And today, we're gonna talk a little bit about the management of high-risk pediatric COVID-19 patients. Uh, thankfully, the pandemic is over. Uh, we're still living through the PTSD of all of that. But there's still work to be done. This is still a significant respiratory virus for many of our patients. And so today, what we're gonna talk about is how to stratify those kids that are in high-risk categories, how to prioritize their testing, and then what we have both for treatment as well as prevention of severe disease in these kids. Uh, to get started, let me just say I do have some potential conflicts of interest. I received grant funding from the NIH and from the CDC as well as from Pfizer vaccines for a C. difficile vaccine clinical trial. I serve on the data and safety monitoring boards for a, a couple of companies for two specific studies. And then I serve as a consultant to a variety of groups really for the purpose of developing new vaccines and new antibiotics and making sure that the ones we have are safe and effective. As we think about therapeutic decision-making for children with COVID, it's really important to recognize what choices we do have and where there are still medical gaps. So I thought I would do this through a case presentation. This is a 14-year-old patient with a history of type 1 diabetes mellitus and autism who presents to the emergency department with fever, cough, and increased work of breathing. The fever has been present for about 4 days and symptoms are starting to worsen. Her oxygen saturations are 93% on room air and the respiratory rate is 25%. So she's placed on nasal cannula oxygen, and she's admitted for observation. So a few questions. Is she at risk? Is she at high risk? Does she need antiviral therapy? And does she need any type of immunomodulation like the corticosteroids or some of the newer agents that we use for COVID? So let's start with, is she at high risk for complications? I think we can absolutely say that she is indeed. Type 1 diabetes increases her risk of COVID-19 severity by about 3 times. And the neurologic condition of autism also increases that. And people often ask, why would autism increase the risk of severe respiratory disease? Because we also see it with influenza. And we think this is in part due to some of the fine motor control needed to cough and to clear the lungs for some neurologic conditions. For some, it's uh a restriction in their ability to communicate effectively what their symptoms actually are. And so rather than relying on both uh the child telling us how they're feeling and us looking at them, we're really limited with the data that we take in, especially parents. Um, and so this is one of the reasons why neurologic disease just writ large is an example of a high-risk condition for respiratory viral infections. So, we would say, yes, she's at high risk for complications. So, because of her being at high risk, are, are, in addition to supportive care, which obviously we do for all patients, what treatments would be recommended? And here, I think we're gonna need to think about where we get these resources. Right now, we get these from the AAP Redbook, from the FDA and from CDC recommendations for treatment. So, let's talk about options first. There are two antiviral therapies that are available for the pediatric population, recognizing that malnupiravir is something that's recommended for children or for adults over 18. The first is normorevir or ritonavir. Um, the population for this currently is those who are 12 years of age and older. And who weigh at least 40 kg. So some of your highest-risk kids who maybe failure to thrive or have chronic GI issues, make sure you remember the 40 kg part there too. It's an oral drug. we treat for 5 days. And it's best used if it's used within 5 days of illness onset. Usually, we use fever as the start of that, um, but, but it depends on how the cadence of the disease has been. The second is Rimdesivir, which we can use down to 1 month of age and at least 3 kg. It's IV only. It's used for 3 days. And here we have a little bit more wiggle room. It's less than 7 days. And in part, it's because we recognize that there may still be a role for antiviral therapy going into that, into that first week of illness, where we start to see more inflammation being driven by the virus rather than just viral effect alone. In addition to the antiviral therapies that are available to us, what are the immunomodulatory options that we have? Uh, and I really wanna highlight three. The first is dexamethasone, which is readily available and readily used. Although we can substitute prednisone when we need to. Uh, we do this on a mgs per kilo basis, and we usually treat for about 5 to 10 days. We also have two inhibitors of upstream inflammation. One is barricinib, which is a, a Janus kinase inhibitor. The second is tosillizumab, which is an IL-6 inhibitor. Remember that IL-6 is a primary driver of things like CRP and is a primary immunomodulating uh uh cytokine, specifically a pro-inflammatory cytokine. And we typically only use these latter two drugs for severe disease or where the use of corticosteroids might be contraindicated, like in someone with really fragile glucose levels. So, when should we consider treatment? And let's start in the outpatient setting. Outpatient setting antiviral therapy or immunomodulator therapy is, is really limited to a couple of situations. First would be if you have moderate or severe immunocompromise, such as cancer, untreated HIV, chronic steroid use, or if there's an underlying condition that increases risk, if they're not up to date on their vaccination and they don't have a, a COVID infection in the previous 4 months. So that would be the either or of those. And, and if you have an age less than 1, Recognizing that those children are at slightly increased risk, or those greater than 12, um, if they have 2 or more underlying medical conditions, or if they have one or more conditions that's severe or, or poorly controlled, this is when we would consider antiviral therapy in the outpatient setting. In the inpatient setting, it's a little bit different. If there's a new or, or increased oxygen demand, recommendations are really based on the route of supplemental oxygen delivery. So, if it's nasal cannula, like the case vignet, then we would start rimdesivir. And if no improvement in 24 to 48 hours, we would add dexamethasone, recognizing that at that stage of the illness, antiviral therapy is probably more important than anti-inflammatory treatment. But if they're on high-flow nasal cannula or greater, then that's when we would start dexamethasone and rimdesivir. And certainly, if they're on mechanical ventilation, if they go on to develop more significant resuscitative needs, we start dexamethasone, and if there's no improvement, we would add bericitinib or tocilizumab. Um, so, these are really important, uh, aspects of care is that there's both an antiviral and an immunomodulator component to it. So what would be the summary of these treatment recommendations? It's to know, test and treat. So, first is to know who's at highest risk for COVID complications, less than 1 month of age, 2 or more comorbidities, 1 or more comorbidities that are poorly controlled or unstable right now. Certainly those who are immunocompromised. We need to be able to test for SARS-COVID-2 in the right clinical context. So this is fever, respiratory illness, sore throat as we've seen with the most recent variant. And then, how do we treat? Well, we treat using a risk-based approach. It's modified by current disease severity. We use antivirals, immunomodulators, or both as we need to. And those recommendations are from the AA AAP Redbook, which I would encourage you to keep bookmarked on your computer or in your office.